Landlord insurance policies usually cost about 25% more than homeowners insurance policies, according to the Insurance Information Institute. The average cost of landlord insurance was $1,478 in annual premium, and the average cost of homeowners insurance was $1,192, as of a few years back.
For example, we got insurance quotes for a typical 3-unit Chicago rental property from five different companies, and the insurance premiums ranged from $2,400 up to $6,600 for the same coverage.
The main reason for the difference becomes clear when you think about who lives in the home. Insurance carriers see fewer claims and lower average loss amounts in owner-occupied homes than rentals. Common sense says no one will take care of a property quite like the owner.
And another difference shows up when you look at the amount of liability insurance coverage. Landlords have higher coverage levels to protect themselves from lawsuits and legal fees that arise from injured tenants or guests. It’s normal for a landlord policy to have a $1m liability limit.
Discounts exist, but it’s not as deal-driven as other types of coverage like car insurance. For instance, State Farm grants price breaks for good grades or driving courses. You won’t find anything like that with landlord insurance.
Instead, take a glance at these two ways to save:
It depends. Answer how often you rent the property and how long people stay to decide what type of insurance you need. Check out these three scenarios to help you pick:
A general rule to help, personal insurance doesn’t cover commercial activity. For instance, many personal finance experts suggest an umbrella policy to protect you from liability claims above your homeowner’s policy limits. But your umbrella policy would not apply to your rental investment property if you set it up as a separate business or LLC.
No, you need not buy both a landlord policy and a renters policy. Some confusion comes from the fact that landlord insurance is sometimes called rental property insurance. Rental property insurance policies cover houses, and renters insurance policies protect your tenants’ personal belongings and liability.
Many landlords require their tenants to buy renters insurance because it reduces headaches when personal property claims arise. For example, if a fire damages your rental and destroys your tenants’ property, they may seek damages against you even though they should have safeguarded themselves with a renters policy.
And landlords request tenants buy renters insurance to protect the tenants after a major claim. Let’s go back to the fire example. If the tenant had to move until repairs were finished, how would they pay for living expenses? The renter’s policy would cover that for them, while your landlord insurance compensated you for your loss of rental income while the home is made livable.
Let’s look at a real rental property to break down what kind of insurance coverage it has and the costs. This 3,700 square-foot apartment building with three rental units lies near downtown Chicago on Fullerton Avenue. It last sold for $950,000 in 2018, and the owner thinks its replacement cost would be about $740,000 at $200 per square foot. It’s fully rented and bringing in a monthly rental income of $6,000.
The owner got three quotes from his insurance agent and bought the landlord insurance policy from USLI for a total annual premium of $3,137.
First, let’s review his insurance coverage and then break down what it means.
Looking at the cost of each line item, we see that some are much more expensive than others:
The dwelling coverage would pay to rebuild the entire building if there were extensive property damage from a fire or natural disaster, so it makes sense that this coverage is the most expensive part at $2,200.
Moving on to “contents,” this will cover damage to the landlord’s personal property that’s kept at the rental property. It’s important to note that this does not protect the tenants’ personal property — that’s what a renters insurance policy is for. Because the limit here is only $5,000, the insurance company isn’t taking on much risk, so the coverage only costs $35.
Next up is vandalism coverage. This insurance coverage is quite pricey at $532. This real estate sits in a dense urban area, which drives up the risk and cost of this additional coverage.
Last, the liability insurance costs $350 for $1m in liability protection and $5,000 in medical payments for tenants and their guests.
The owner believes that his landlord insurance coverage protects against just about anything that could happen to his property, and he’s in good shape. He’s not.
Did you notice the column in the printout where it says “Valuation?” There you’ll find the words “Actual Cash Value.” That doesn’t mean what it sounds like.
Actual Cash Value (ACV) is what someone would pay you in cash for a piece of property: the replacement cost minus depreciation. For instance, let’s say the owner installed a roof, and it costs $40,000—that’s the replacement cost. But he installed the roof in 1999, so by now, it’s racked up $18,000 in depreciation. The Actual Cash Value is now only $22,000; that’s the replacement cost of $40k minus $18k in depreciation.
So, if the landlord has a covered loss on the roof, his property coverage will only value the roof at $22,000, even though it will cost $40,000 to repair. It gets worse. The owner has a deductible of $2,500. Finally, the owner will end up with a check for only $19,500 to replace a roof that will cost $40k. That means he must come up with $20,500 out of pocket.
Bottom line: The owner should probably get a new quote where the valuation method is “Replacement Cost” instead of “Actual Cash Value.”
We spoke with a real estate investor and he shared an insight on how he uses landlord insurance for the properties that he rehabilitates that he rents out to tenants in the future.
Remember you should only have a landlord insurance policy in place when the property is actually tenant occupied. You need what is called a vacant policy which as you can imagine is more expensive because statistically, a vacant property is much more likely to file a claim. We use a vacant policy after we have completed construction and are waiting to place a tenant. After the tenant has moved in we convert the policy to a landlord policy which is cheaper. Looking back at your historical expenses a vacant policy is 120% more expensive than a landlord policy (861 annual landlord versus 1880 annual vacant)Bill Samuel | Blue Ladder Development
Insurance for landlords and tenants is all we do.Get started